Jelbert v Davis [1968]


  • An easement granted access to dominant land “at all times and for all purposes”
  • At the time of grant, the easement was used for agricultural purposes
  • The dominant land owner planned to redevelop his farm into a caravan site capable of sustaining 200 caravans at any one time


  • Would this constitute substantial interference with the easement?


  • Yes


  • Although access by caravans could not be prevented, the circumstantial impact of the intensification would be substantial, rendering the easement suspended
  • The court did not rule on how many caravan plots might constitute non-substantial interference
RELATED CASE  Re Draper's Conveyance [1969]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 26th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy