James Jones v Earl of Tankerville [1909]

Facts

  • James Jones was granted the right to chop down trees and take timber from the land of the Earl of Tankerville (a profit a prendre)
  • The Earl of Tankerville repudiated the contract giving Jones Jones buy ativan xanax valium this right

Issue

  • Could James Jones obtain an injunction restraining this repudiation?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

RELATED CASE  Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt [1962]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 24th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy