Holwell Securities v Hughes [1974]

Facts

  • Hughes offered Holwell Securities at £45,000 option on his house, requiring “notice in writing” of acceptance
  • Holwell Securities posted a letter of acceptance before the deadline, which was received after the deadline

Issue

  • Did the postal rule apply to such a case

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • The postal rule can be ousted by the requirement of “notice in writing” or where it would lead to “manifest inconvenience or absurdity”
  • In this case, notice in writing was required
RELATED CASE  Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-cello-corp [1979]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 20th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy