Hamilton v Allied Domecq 
- A company was invested in by the claimant, who assumed that his plans to market the defendant’s bottled water products in a certain way would be followed
- Following investment, the defendant followed an entirely order xanax online canada different distribution strategy which caused his shares to become worthless
- Could the contracted be rescinded for misrepresentation?
- No duty to volunteer information (such as intentions) into a contract, therefore no misrepresentation
Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 27th April 2014