Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961]

Facts

  • From the defendant’s land emanated acid smuts which damaged the claimant’s car

Issue

  • Could damages and an injunction be claimed despite the fact that Esso’s nuisance was a public nuisance?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Special damage requirement satisfied
  • Damages may include those for inconvenience and pure economic loss
RELATED CASE  Corey v Havender [1902, America]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy