Goldberg v Edwards [1960]

Facts

  • A landlord leased an annex to his house
  • He permitted the tenant to access the annex through his house, although other access via a covered passageway was also possible
  • The tenant was replaced by the claimant, who also accessed the annex through the landlord’s house, against his wishes
  • The landlord stopped the claimant’s access through his house

Issue

  • Had the new tenancy agreement converted the old tenant’s personal right of access into an easement?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Section 62 of the Law of Property act had converted the right, and did not have a requirement of necessity
  • The date of execution, applicable to actual use, was irrelevant considering that the lease had been backdated
RELATED CASE  Somma v Hazelhurst [1978]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 26th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy