Gamerco v ICM/Fair Warning Agency 
- Gamerco claimed under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 for the return of just over $400,000 in advertising after the defendant’s stadium was ruled unsafe for use in a Guns ‘N’ Roses concert which the defendants had already been partly paid to provide
- Could expenses be returned?
- Recovery of money already paid allowed, expenses of ICM not deduced from recovery
Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 29th April 2014