Gamerco v ICM/Fair Warning Agency [1995]

Facts

  • Gamerco claimed under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 for the return of just over $400,000 in advertising after the defendant’s stadium was ruled unsafe for use in a Guns ‘N’ Roses concert which the defendants had already been partly paid to provide

Issue

  • Could expenses be returned?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Recovery of money already paid allowed, expenses of ICM not deduced from recovery
RELATED CASE  Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems [2003]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 29th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy