Fitzwilliam v Richall Holdings Services [2013]

Facts

  • Fitzwillaim’s land had been fraudulently transferred to Richall Holdings Services as a result of a forged power of attorney

Issue

  • Could Fitzwilliam have the register corrected?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Although the court (High Court) was bound by buy alprazolam paypal Enterprises v Cheshire Homes [2002]” href=”https://webstroke.co.uk/law/cases/malory-enterprises-v-cheshire-homes-2002″>Malory Enterprises v Cheshire Homes [2002] (Court of Appeal), it criticised the¬†outcome as a backwards steps in ensuring the certainty of the land register
RELATED CASE  Goldberg v Edwards [1960]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 5th February 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy