FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014]


  • The defendant solicitors advised FHR on the purchase of shares in the Monte Carlo Grand Hotel worth EUR 211.5 million, in return for remuneration
  • As a result of the transaction, the solicitors also obtained a EUR 10 million payment, in breach of fiduciary duty as the consent of FHR had not been obtained


  • Was the EUR 10 million a personal or proprietary remedy available to the principal?


  • Proprietary


  • Bribes should become the property of the principal as they are effectively a loss to that principal
  • Bribes undermine the commercial world
  • Bribes do not prejudice other creditors as they shouldn’t have existed in the first place
  • The rule that all breaches of fiduciary duties should give rise to proprietary remedies has the added benefit of simplicity

RELATED CASE  Ingmar v Eaton Leonard [2001, ECJ]

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 13th January 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy