Dooley v Cammel Laird [1951]


  • Dooley, a crane operator feared for the life of his colleagues when his load dropped in an area he knew them to be, as a result of the provision of rope which was too thin
  • Dooley suffered from serious mental injury and could not go back to work buy xanax with american express (although none of his colleagues were injured)


  •  Could Dooley recover from his employers for his shock


  •  Recovery allowed


  •  The incident was a foreseeable result of the employer’s failure to provide the correct rope


[1971] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 271

RELATED CASE  Wilsher v Essex AHA [1988]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 29th May 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy