Dimmock v Hallett 
- In selling some farm land, the defendant told the claimant that all of the farms were under tenancy, which was factually true
- The defendant failed to mention that all of the tenants had given notice to vacate their land
- Could the contract of sale be rescinded?
- Misleading to omit such vital information where the reason for the question was clear
Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 27th April 2014