Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank Plc [2006]

Facts

  • HM Customs and Excise Commissioners ordered Barclays bank to put a freezing injunction upon the accounts of one of their customers to prevent withdrawal of money which had been legal seized for tax evasion
  • Barclays negligently dealt with this request, so the criminal (customer) got his money out and fled

Issue

  • Could Barclays be liable for their negligent actions?

Decision

  • No liability

Reasoning

  • No duty to stop the owner of his money taking his money, and Barclays did not attempt to ignore a court order
  • The Caparo test shows whether there is an assumption of responsibility, there wasn’t in this case
RELATED CASE  R Addie & Sons v Dumbreck [1929]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 25th November 2016

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy