Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing Co 
- The claimant signed a contract for the cleaning of her wedding dress without reading, which provided that no liability would be accepted for damage caused to the dress in its entirety
- She was told that the document said only liability to beads and sequins was excluded
- The dress was returned with a stain on it
- Could damages be claimed? Was the exclusion clause effective
- Claim succeeded, not incorporated
Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 28th April 2014