Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971]

Facts

  • A mortgagee took possession of land which had recently acquired planning permission for 100 flats and 35 houses
  • The mortgagee sold the land, with reference to the planning permission for the 35 houses, but not the 100 flats

Issue

  • Was the mortgagee liable to the mortgagor?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • A mortgagee is under a duty to take reasonable care to obtain the true market value of land
  • This duty was breach where the mortgagee failed to make reference to the (very valuable) planning permission for 100 flats
RELATED CASE  Browne v Warner (1808)

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 29th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy