Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister 
- A purchaser purchased land subject to a restrictive covenant
- The covenant did not disclose the extent of the benefitted land
- Was the covenant enforceable?
- It would be oppressive for a purchaser to have to establish the extent of the benefit of a covenant; the land benefitted must be easily ascertainable – it wasn’t on these facts
Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 12th May 2015