Credit Lyonnais Bank v Burch [1997]

Facts

  • A junior employee was asked to secure the company’s debts with her own house and take responsibility for any further debt
  • The bank quickly tried to enforce the security by repossessing the employee’s house

Issue

  • Could the transaction be set aside for undue influence

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • There was no relationship of trust and confidence, but such a significantly risky transaction should put the bank on notice
RELATED CASE  Hutton v Warren [1836]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 20th January 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy