C&P Haulage v Middleton [1983]

Facts

  • Middleton had a licence to occupy C&P’s premises for 6 months, provided that at the end of the 6 months, any improvements added to the building were not removed

Issue

  • After being evicted 10 weeks prior to the end of the 6 months, could Middleton claim damages for the improvements made to the building?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • After the breach, Middleton moved back to his house and worked rent free, therefore he would be unjustly enriched if damages were awarded; at the end of the 6 months, he would have had to leave the ‘improvements’ anyway
RELATED CASE  Krell v Henry [1903]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy