Cooke v Lewis [1951, Canada]

Facts

  • Two defendants were shooting in a forest
  • They each spotted an animal and shot at it
  • The animal was in fact the claimant, and no-one could be sure which bullet had missed and which one had injured the claimant

Issue

  • Who was liable for shooting the claimant?

Decision

  • Both defendants equally

Reasoning

  • Justice required the ‘but for’ test to be disregarded
RELATED CASE  Young v Kent County Council [2005]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 22nd April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy