Cooke v Lewis [1951, Canada]


  • Two defendants were shooting in a forest
  • They each spotted an animal and shot at it
  • The animal was in fact the claimant, and no-one could be sure which bullet had missed and which one had injured the claimant


  • Who was liable for shooting the claimant?


  • Both defendants equally


  • Justice required the ‘but for’ test to be disregarded
RELATED CASE  Robinson v Kilvert [1889]

Posted in Tort Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 22nd April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy