Cohen v Roche [1927]

Facts

  • Unique furniture was contracted to be sold
  • The defendant refused to sell it

Issue

  • Could specific performance be ordered?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • Although there was a unique circumstance to the contract, the intention of the claimant was to sell it on for profit, therefore damages were adequate.
RELATED CASE  Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989]

Posted in Contract Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th April 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy