Centaploy v Matlodge [1974]

Facts

  • A lease was granted which denied a landlord any right to determine the lease

Issue

  • Did this violate the requirement of certainty of duration of periodic tenancies?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Such a denial of rights would be repugnant to the nature of a tenancy
  • Both landlords and tenants must have unqualified rights to determine tenancies, irrespective of their contractual intentions
  • This case overruledĀ Re Midland Railway Agreement [1971]
  • To find the other requirements of leases, visit land law notes on leases
RELATED CASE  Mikeover v Brady [1989]

Posted in Land Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 3rd April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy