Case C-315/92 Clinique 
Case C-315/92 Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v Clinique Laboratories SNC and Estée Lauder Cosmetics GmbH (‘Clinique’) 
- A German consumer protection measure prevented Clinique (an Estée Lauder consmetics brand) from marketing products labelled ‘Clinique’, as consumers might be misled into believing that the products were clinical in nature
- Did this measure violate Art 34 TFEU on the prevention of measures affecting the free buy xanax mexico movement of goods between EU Member States?
- The increased burden on Clinique to re-brand and re-advertise its products differently in Germany impeded on the free movement of goods
- The German measure was not justifiable as protecting consumers as consumers were unlikely to be misled by the brnad name
- This case had ramifications in German consumer law, which has since been reformed
Posted in EU Law Revision Notes.
This page was last updated on 20th August 2015
© 2019 Webstroke Law - Terms