Case C-283/94 Denkavit [1996]

Facts

  • A complex tax directive was incorrectly implemented by Germany

Issue

  • Could Denkavit recover for its loss due to the incorrect implementation under state liability?

Decision

  • No

Reasoning

  • The interpretation was not ‘sufficiently serious’
  • The mistake was made in good faith
  • The directive supported the mistaken interpretation, as evidenced by other Member States interpreting it in the same way
RELATED CASE  Case C-210/03 (Swedish Match) [2004]

Posted in EU Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 30th April 2015

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy