Boardman v Phipps [1967]


  • A solicitor for a trust fund noticed a significant opportunity in the accounts of the company
  • He utilised this opportunity with the knowledge of some of the trustees, making a significant profit for both the trustees and himself


  • Was the solicitor liable for his personal profit?


  • Yes


  • The solicitor had acted on information available to him only due to his agency relationship with the trust fund
  • He used this information for his own personal profit, which breached his fiduciary obligation not to make any unauthorised profit
  • Not all of the trustees consented to the profit
  • The solicitor was able to keep a significant equitable allowance for his effort though
  • Lord Denning, in the Court of Appeal (current case in House of Lords) advocated a very significant equitable allowance
RELATED CASE  Jones v Hope (1880)

Posted in Commercial Law Revision Notes.

This page was last updated on 31st December 2014

© 2020 Webstroke Law - Terms and Privacy Policy