Top Left Background Top Right Background
Bottom Right Background

Arcos Ltd v Ronaasen [1933]

Facts

  • 1/2″ thick wood was ordered, 9/16″ thick delivered

Issue

  • Could 9/16″ be rejected?

Decision

  • Yes

Reasoning

  • Minor defect, certainty in contract, motive (falling wood costs) irrelevant
Goto Top
Close Notification

Recent News

Other News